It should be no surprise that Obama chose Ghana for his first trip as U.S President to Sub-Saharan Africa. What seems more of a surprise is the supposed outrage coming out of nations such as Kenya and Nigeria, or even South Africa. The populist rants on facebook and other social networking spaces makes me feel nauseated, "what's so great about Ghana? Nigeria is after all the most popular nation in Africa and guess what we have oil," or " how can he betray Kenya, his father was born here, are we no longer good for him" seems to be the order of the month. But wait what makes Ghana any less worthy than Kenya or Nigeria? We are seriously missing the point (as usual we (Africans) love to criticise and very rarely sit, scratch our heads in view of the context within which we "doth protest.")
First of all Kenya has become an embarrassment, a shame really, this is not personal it is all politics. Kenya was once the pride of Africa, now it is its laughing stock. Do women really need to restrict sex as a last hope for political action? You know your case is hopeless when even this last desperate attempt does not work. In a world where a politician can claim a suit against his wife for denying him sex all that can be said is that "they really do not get it." South Africa with Zuma’s elections and rising violence does not ring a hopeful tune in the ears of the man whose campaign slogan was that of HOPE. As for Nigeria, let me not even go there...I will however, discuss why it is more than fitting for the US president to visit a nation like Ghana...Yes I will dare to defend this decision.
The small nation of Ghana (barely the size of Oregon), since independence has been the gateway to Africa. Ghana's African record setting has been unmatched, since the fateful day of March 6 1957, Ghana has given Africa many gifts including Nkrumah, who introduced and spent his life promoting the novel idea of Pan-Africanism. Ghana powered West Africa with the first Dam of its kind. The very name Ghana (Warrior King), embodies historical prowess. The engraved sense of self-determination won us our independence from our European counterparts (the first Sub-Saharan African nation to do so). Yet it is not only Ghana's history which makes it so unique, nor what sets it apart for the honour of being the first nation to be visited by the first Black African United States president. It is Ghana's future, it is the will of the people to always be in charge of their future which makes Ghana ripe for such a visit, the need to defile any such myths that African's cannot be lovers of peace and democracy is what lies at the heart of Ghana's future.
Obama's trip will seek to mix the past with the future, he will come to represent his African American brothers and sisters whose ancestors were brutally removed from the continent centuries ago....encapsulated by the planned visit to the Cape Coast Castle a historical fortress which marked the biggest passage ways for the Atlantic Slave trade. The Irony, however, is that Obama's history is that linked to Kenya, his ancestors were not slaves, but this experience in a way would be a time of reflection and a chance to gain more of an insight into the history of the people who made his election a reality.
So finally why Ghana? Because Ghana is Africa in every way, Ghana is its history, and Ghana is Africa's future, Ghana is where others should be and the story of Ghana is the story of the Africa very rarely published in world news. Obama's visit should be a point of pride for every African because the optimism of Ghana will show that a new Africa has arrived and will be here to stay.
2 comments:
right on, marcia! i dont think it'd have made sense for obama to have decided to visit any other sub saharan african country. but dat is also a very sad commentary upon our politics and leadership since independence. if after fighting for self rule, over half a century later, 10 states cannot be pointed to who can stand on their feet with pride, there's a lot of self introspection dat we need to do.
rather than lament why obama didnt choose to visit them or lambast ghana as unworthy of the visit, it will serve those people well to look into themselves and see what is holding them back.
thanks for dis, marcia. and oh, i also absolutely agree with when it comes to MJ.
As a Kenyan, I have to agree that we were not the most worthy candidate on this visit but you didn't have to pull our women's threats into this, they were below the belt, pun intended.
I think Ghana, as in the 50s and 60s, has a lot to offer Africa, by way of setting the example and agenda.
My hope is that the peaceful elections and transfer of power between NPP and NDC can translate to gains in governance and resource utilisation... Ghana may not be in the eye of the western media but as an African I am all for more nations that are setting a progressive agenda for the their populations and the continent, even if it goes on below the radar.
Viva Ghana!
Post a Comment